On the Shelf
Character Restrict: How Elon Musk Destroyed Twitter
By Kate Conger and Ryan MacPenguin Press: 480 pages, $32
For those who purchase books linked on our web site, The Occasions might earn a fee from Bookshop.org, whose charges help unbiased bookstores.
Elon Musk is sort of as inescapable as Donald Trump. The proprietor of SpaceX and Tesla and the world’s richest man, Musk makes headlines weekly. However lately, it’s extra for X, the place he stirs up controversy by seemingly amplifying right-wing views and reposting feedback suggesting that girls mustn’t have the correct to vote (solely “excessive standing males” and a few others ought to). Musk additionally not too long ago hosted an interview with Trump that was full of falsehoods. Final week, Trump proposed a authorities effectivity fee headed by Musk.
Whereas Walter Isaacson simply informed Musk’s life story in a certified biography, a brand new guide zeroes in on Musk and his buy and possession of Twitter. “Character Restrict: How Elon Musk Destroyed Twitter” — out Tuesday — is written by two California-based New York Occasions reporters: Kate Conger, who lives in Oakland and has been masking Twitter, and Ryan Mac, who lives in Los Angeles and regularly writes about Musk. When their two topics converged, they began working collectively and realized the story warranted a big-picture look past what day by day articles might present.
“The Isaacson guide is the guide that Elon wished,” Mac mentioned in a latest joint video interview with Conger. “You possibly can inform by the quantity that he’s promoted it himself.”
Conger notes that whereas they didn’t get to interview Musk for the guide and located Isaacson’s guide useful for offering Musk’s perspective, “we benefited from reporting round Elon slightly than by Elon.”
“You get the clearest portrait of somebody from folks near them, not essentially from themselves,” she mentioned. “All of us have a clouded imaginative and prescient of who we’re and the way we come throughout on this planet.”
This interview has been edited for size and readability.
Earlier than Musk, Twitter had severe monetary, management and content material moderation points. Did Musk destroy Twitter or simply remake it in his personal more and more twisted picture?
Kate Conger: There was this actually simplistic narrative that it was the nice guys at Twitter versus the dangerous man in Elon and the story is way more difficult than that so we wished to seize how Twitter got here to be able the place somebody might swoop in and purchase it the best way Elon did.
Ryan Mac: However on the semantics, Twitter doesn’t exist anymore. It’s X. On monetary metrics, the valuation of the corporate has tanked. Now it’s banned in Brazil. So he has actually devalued or destroyed elements of the corporate right down to the title itself.
Why did issues go so improper beneath Musk?
Mac: He believed he had this experience in Twitter as a result of he’s an avid social media consumer. He thought, “I’ve probably the most followers, due to this fact I do know what’s greatest for this firm.”
It’s inarguable what he’s completed as an entrepreneur. SpaceX has revolutionized the area trade. Tesla has mainstreamed electrical automobiles. He didn’t know a lot about manufacturing electrical autos. He wasn’t a rocket scientist. However he was capable of strip issues right down to first ideas and do issues extra effectively.
So he’s so satisfied that his intuition is true that he acts on any impulse: “I’m the hero, due to this fact I ought to dictate what occurs.” He has been so profitable, however within the case of Twitter, that intuition didn’t serve him properly.
Conger: Twitter is basically a social drawback not a tech drawback whereas his different companies focus totally on engineering points. He didn’t acknowledge the character restrict he’d attain with the challenges he didn’t know the way to take care of.
Mac: There’s not many abilities there that match up. Everybody has their very own blind spots and in some methods, this guide is about Elon’s blind spots, however the concern is that nobody can maintain him to account.
And he has in some methods radicalized himself. His X feed is plagued by misinformation and posts with a Nazi apologist.
You’d count on extra from a “excessive standing male” like himself.
Mac: That’s one other submit that isn’t even on the spectrum of affordable political debate. It’s simply weird to me.
Have been you guys lively Twitter customers?
Mac: Essentially the most addicted.
So, like Elon, you can run the corporate?
Mac: Oh hell no. It’s just like the Protection [Against] the Darkish Arts place in “Harry Potter” the place folks simply cycle by. It’s the worst job on this planet since you’re simply going to get yelled at by some faction on a regular basis. It’s hubristic to suppose you can do it and I believe it takes somebody form of loopy. Hopefully I’m sane sufficient to reject that place when it’s provided to me.
When it’s provided? For those who have been in cost, what would you wish to see by way of content material moderation?
Conger: I’m within the mannequin [former Twitter Chief Executive] Parag Agrawal was exploring, permitting extra sorts of content material with out giving them algorithmic amplification and attain. The trade extra broadly is beginning to drift in that path and it’s value exploring.
Ryan, what about you?
Mac: That is the opening of that hubristic perception that I ought to have the ability to run an organization. I’ll go away that to the professionals.
Conger: Very first thing Ryan would do is ban my account.
Mac: I’d additionally ban my account so I don’t have to make use of it anymore.
Do you guys use X much less now resulting from Elon’s adjustments?
Conger: Sure. It’s principally a perform of the those who I observe migrating to Mastodon, Threads and Bluesky so I chase my curiosity teams across the web.
How a lot impression does X have on politics?
Conger: There may be this frequent notion of tech corporations that they’re these kind of impartial, faceless entities making an attempt to maintain their thumbs off the size. Twitter’s all the time tried to take care of this center floor the place it’s an area for political dialog, however the platform has tried to remain within the shadows of that. We’re simply right here for no matter goes. Elon has very clearly and clearly damaged that mould. I hope readers perceive extra clearly that this was, is and will likely be a instrument for controlling political discourse and to consider it in that method. I actually need to dispel the notion that any of those platforms maintain a impartial stance.
So ought to folks shift to Threads or different locations whereas Musk owns X?
Conger: I don’t suppose we need to be ushering a consumer base from Elon Musk over to Mark Zuckerberg.
Mac: I don’t really feel nice about utilizing Threads, to be sincere. I’ve had my very own points with Zuckerberg.
Conger: Ryan is universally unpopular with CEOs.
Mac: At the least Zuckerberg hasn’t banned me, which Musk truly did for a bit.
Conger: Give it time.
Mac: However individuals are already leaving X. Musk is driving folks away. Threads and Bluesky had banner days from Brazilians becoming a member of their platforms. That might compound on itself and have a disastrous impact for X.
If X fails utterly, will which have any impression on Musk?
Mac: I do suppose this has broken his status. He isn’t the all-conquering entrepreneur that may stroll into any state of affairs and declare himself the skilled. However he’s nonetheless the world’s richest man. SpaceX is extra dominant than ever. Tesla is now the dominant electrical car vendor right here. So I believe 10 years from now, he’ll be extra outstanding than ever.